Disability Harassment Under the Americans with Disabilities Act: Law Firm of Miller Canfield
Click here Would you like to report this content as inappropriate? Click here Do you believe that this item violates a copyright? There's a problem loading this menu right now. Get fast, free shipping with Amazon Prime.
Related Video Shorts (0)
Your recently viewed items and featured recommendations. View or edit your browsing history. Get to Know Us.
English Choose a language for shopping. Not Enabled Word Wise: Not Enabled Screen Reader: Enabled Amazon Best Sellers Rank: Would you like to report this content as inappropriate? Do you believe that this item violates a copyright?
Publisher Series: Critical America
Amazon Music Stream millions of songs. Amazon Drive Cloud storage from Amazon. Alexa Actionable Analytics for the Web. AmazonGlobal Ship Orders Internationally. Amazon Inspire Digital Educational Resources. Amazon Rapids Fun stories for kids on the go.
Black Men on Race, Gender, and Sexuality: Chicano Students and the Courts: Citizenship and Its Exclusions: The Color of Crime: A Reader by Adrien Katherine Wing. An Introduction by Richard Delgado. Does the law morally bind the poor?
The Emergence of Mexican America: Recovering Stories of Mexican Peoplehood in U. From the Ground up: Getting in the Game: Heretics in the Temple: Lawyers' Ethics and the Pursuit of Social Justice: In Flowers , the employee provided evidence that her superiors treated her markedly different after her immediate supervisor discovered she was infected by the Human Immunodeficiency Virus "HIV". Immediate supervisor no longer went to lunch with the employee and ceased socializing with her.
Download Disability Harassment Critical America Series
Immediate supervisor began intercepting the employee's telephone calls, eavesdropping on her conversations, and hovering around the employee's desk. The company president became very distant, when he and the employee used to get along very well.
The company president refused to shake the employee's hand and would go to great pains to avoid her office. The employee was required to submit to four random drug tests within a one-week period, when she had previously only had one drug test in her two years of service.